Expert warns of insufficient virus protection
November 19, 2010
There is an interesting article on viruses and filters in a Swedish newspaper today. Experts warn us that some filters are not efficient enough. They claim that some filters only catch 30% of the harmful e-mails. The reason for this being that the virus makers are quick at making new version and varieties of the code so it is hard to keep a traditional filter updated.
At SpamDrain we use artificial intelligence to continually refine the filtering process. This means that the filter can ‘learn’ what is spam and what is valid e-mail. The filter can therefore keep itself updated and quickly learn new tricks used by hackers to get their e-mails through spam filters.
This works quite nicely in Spamdrain when filtering spam and e-mail viruses. It would though be interesting to know if one could do something similar with desktop virus protection. I know that anti-virus companies have done some efforts in trying to “learn” the patterns of viruses and block viruses they don’t know about, but it’s unclear how well these techniques work.
Comcast Email Migration to Yahoo Mail—What It Means for Spam
Comcast is migrating comcast.net email to Yahoo Mail. Learn what changes, why spam filtering resets, and how to keep your inbox clean after the switch. Continue reading
Why Email Spam Still Exists in 2025
Spam filtering has improved dramatically over decades, yet unwanted email persists. The economics of spam and the adaptation cycle explain why—and what actually helps. Continue reading

